🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is commemorated is a reflection of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to erase Black history and legacy from the archives is under way. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the history when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.